Back to news
africa

Kenyan Judiciary Dismisses Lawyers' Call for Court Boycott

Kenya's judicial system has rejected a proposed nationwide boycott of court proceedings by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK). The Judiciary has affirmed that all court operations will continue as scheduled, urging legal professionals to pursue constructive dialogue for resolving disputes.

8/22/2026, 9:01:26 PM

The Kenyan Judiciary has firmly stated its opposition to a proposed nationwide boycott of court proceedings, a move advocated by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK). Despite the LSK's call, judicial authorities have confirmed that all courts across the country are expected to operate normally this Wednesday. According to AllAfrica Top, the Judiciary emphasized that its facilities would remain fully open and accessible, urging legal practitioners to engage in discussions rather than interrupt essential judicial services. The institution underscored the importance of maintaining an uninterrupted flow of justice and ensuring that public access to legal remedies is not hampered by industrial action. Justice Philip Mugo, in a statement released by the judiciary, highlighted the potential negative consequences of a boycott on the public, particularly those seeking timely legal recourse. He stressed that avenues for resolving disagreements exist within established frameworks and should be utilized to address any grievances the legal fraternity might have. The Law Society of Kenya had announced its intention to stage a boycott to draw attention to various concerns affecting its members and the administration of justice. However, the Judiciary maintains that such actions are counterproductive and could severely disrupt the delivery of justice to citizens who depend on the courts. Officials from the judicial branch reiterated their commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that court functions continue without interruption. They encouraged advocates to consider the impact of any work stoppage on litigants and the broader judicial process, advocating for sustained engagement and negotiation as a preferred method for resolving professional disagreements. The directive from the Judiciary serves as a clear message that despite calls for a shutdown, the machinery of justice will continue to turn, and all scheduled court matters are expected to proceed as planned, with legal professionals anticipated to fulfill their duties.

Share