Back to news
technology

O’Leary Scales Back Ambitious Utah Data Center Project

Venture capitalist Kevin O'Leary has committed to significantly reducing the footprint of his proposed data center in Utah. This decision follows considerable opposition from local communities and environmental advocates concerned about the project's scale.

6/18/2026, 11:00:41 PM

Kevin O'Leary, a prominent figure in the investment world, has agreed to substantially decrease the size of a planned data center development in Utah. The initial proposal, spanning a vast 40,000 acres, drew significant criticism from both Utah residents and various advocacy groups. The agreement, as reported by The Verge, involves nearly halving the project's acreage. Mr. O'Leary conveyed this modification in a written communication to Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams, indicating a withdrawal of approximately 19,430 acres from the original plan. This adjustment effectively brings the projected size down to just over 20,000 acres. The pushback against the development stemmed from a variety of concerns. Environmental organizations and local citizens voiced worries regarding potential ecological impact, particularly concerning water usage in an arid region. Additionally, there were apprehensions about the visual impact of such a large-scale industrial facility on the landscape and the demands it would place on existing infrastructure. Initially championed by state officials as a significant economic boon, the development faced hurdles as public outcry intensified. The considerable land area involved, combined with the energy and water requirements typical of large data centers, made it a focal point for debate within the community. The revised plan aims to address some of these anxieties by presenting a more modest proposal. While the exact long-term implications of this downsizing remain to be seen, it represents a notable shift in the project's trajectory. The move by Mr. O'Leary suggests an acknowledgment of the community's concerns and an effort to find a more mutually acceptable path forward for the tech infrastructure development in the Beehive State. The process underscores the growing tension between rapid technological expansion and the preservation of local environments and community interests.

Share