Back to news
finance

Connecticut Officials Urge FERC Review of Utility Transmission Charges

Connecticut's Attorney General and various state regulatory bodies are pressing the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to eliminate an additional charge applied to regional transmission organization (RTO) costs for Eversource and Avangrid. They argue this adder unnecessarily inflates consumer energy bills without providing commensurate benefits.

6/30/2026, 12:01:04 PM

Consumer advocates and state agencies in Connecticut are advocating for the removal of a specific fee embedded in the transmission rates charged by major utility companies, according to Yahoo Finance. The state's Attorney General, along with the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), the Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC), and the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), have formally petitioned the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to eliminate this additional component from the regional transmission organization (RTO) expenses of Eversource and United Illuminating, a subsidiary of Avangrid. The core of the argument presented to FERC centers on the substantial financial impact this charge has on electricity consumers. State officials contend that this "return on equity" adder, currently set at 50 basis points, results in millions of dollars in extra costs annually that are ultimately passed on to residents and businesses. They assert that this incremental charge does not correspond to any tangible improvements in the reliability or efficiency of the power grid, nor does it incentivize beneficial investments. The request highlights a long-standing debate concerning the appropriate level of compensation for utilities managing essential infrastructure. Critics of the adder argue that it represents an unwarranted bonus, particularly given the large, stable revenues already enjoyed by these regulated monopolies. By removing this specific percentage point addition, the Connecticut authorities believe that customer bills could see a noticeable reduction, providing much-needed relief amid rising energy costs. Furthermore, the state agencies emphasize that eliminating the adder aligns with the public interest by ensuring fair and reasonable rates for electricity. Their filing with FERC seeks a thorough review of the justification for such charges and ultimately calls for its discontinuation. This collective effort underscores a concerted push by Connecticut to exert greater influence over the factors contributing to the final price of electricity for its citizens.

Share